• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.
Persimmon

Persimmon

Fruity
Joined
Last seen
Messages
1,736
Likes received
10,053

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About Post areas

  • inverted_helix
    Persimmon
    Persimmon
    At minimum, this violates conservation of momentum (a feature shared with pretty much all proposed reactionless propulsion systems).

    I would not be too excited about hypothetical reactionless thrusters until one has been demonstrated, and with more thrust than would be possible with magnetosphere interactions.
    inverted_helix
    inverted_helix
    I'm always excited at any opportunity to escape the constraints of real world physics. I'm all too aware that lately all of them have been false and our current understanding is more solid than ever. Doesn't stop me hoping.
    Lemonbarb
    When I saw you mutter hell on math, it reminded me of the hell known as... Spreadsheets. Especially when wanked for quest management and worse, *Mechanics*. :p
    inverted_helix
    Since you seem to have a handle on the science behind particle accelerators, what sort of range would be likely on them?
    View previous comments…
    magic9mushroom
    magic9mushroom
    Yes, obviously, there are ways that you can actually cool the beam and those will reduce divergence in the case where there is not a laser beam there. But that's not related to my point - that the laser itself will only stop the beam spreading out while it is there, and once it is gone the beam will continue spreading at whatever rate it was doing so before the laser was applied.
    magic9mushroom
    magic9mushroom
    Again, IH, I do not believe you know what you're talking about enough to pick holes in what I say. I can tell you're in parrot mode here and Persimmon is not (some of this is a bit beyond my level, but a lot of it isn't).
    magic9mushroom
    magic9mushroom
    (Parrot, or "script kiddie" mode is enough for most things - we can't all be specialists in everything - but part of self-awareness is knowing when you're in that mode and that you shouldn't debate from it.)
    inverted_helix
    I prefer not to continue the Mass Effect Derail further in that thread, but I tend to think that the dreadnought sized carriers might well have *been* a mistake, just an understandable one. Mass Effect isn't that far in the future, so humans would still be carrying forward their understanding of carrier doctrine from wet water navies. Certainly no other race built carriers that big.
    inverted_helix
    Wildly inefficient to use Mecha to mine limestone. Mecha are going to be huge, very costly, and not offer all that much HP. Plus the estimates we have are leaning towards months to produce each unit. If we convert it from a pit mine to something like the iron mine we can keep normal workers on it.
    • Like
    Reactions: Ddmkm122
    View previous comments…
    inverted_helix
    inverted_helix
    We're already expecting to sell off a lot of our stuff, possibly in spring. Doing it too early is counterproductive.

    In terms of the Chesapeake facility though I expect it to fall, but it's so useful to have a port facility that it's worth rolling even low odds on it surviving.
    Persimmon
    Persimmon
    Thanks for the info on the newest turbofans. I've been dragged into a wikiwalk that will eat up more of my time ;p
    inverted_helix
    inverted_helix
    The latest turbofans put in the latest release of the 737-Max 8 are really pushing efficiency boundaries.

    Incidentally even a smaller 2 engine plane can outperform payload/fuel a larger 4 engine one, I have figures on that.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top