• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Search results for query: *

  1. Susano

    The Great Foreskin Debate

    That still isn't the ad hominem fallacy. I didn't dismiss your argument out of hand because it's you who wrote it; that would be the ad hominem fallacy. I dismissed your argument as temper tantrum because it consisted of idiotic one-liners like "Because children are fucking retarded that's...
  2. Susano

    The Great Foreskin Debate

    Do you even fucking know what an ad hominem is? Hint: It isn't using insults or swearwords. ...you're shit at arguing, aren't you? I mean goddamn. How could there possibly be a debate when you answer to well-considered posts with stupid oneliners, refuse to engage any actual argument and start...
  3. Susano

    The Great Foreskin Debate

    Those aren't arguments. This is throwing a temper tantrum.
  4. Susano

    The Great Foreskin Debate

    That is not the concern of the state. I mean, I'm too lazy to go hunt for examples now, but I'm sure we can all agree that there are a thousand religious practices that are harmful and should hence not enjoy state protection. What people believe for themselves shouldn't enter the equation; what...
  5. Susano

    The Great Foreskin Debate

    And at the end of the day, that's kinda the problem here... I mean, yeah, it "works", yes, but as this is an irreversible intervention into the bodily integrity of a person, no matter how miniscule, I do think this isn't something that should fall under the caretaker powers (and it should indeed...
Back
Top