• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Just what kind of capabilities do OP's have in their own threads?

Guardian Box

Theocratic Capitalist
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
5,228
Likes received
95,594
For example, suppose I, hypothetically, make a thread in one of the creative writing sections, but someone posts something that I very much do not appreciate in my thread (for example, something that absolutely fucking murders my will to write another chapter of a particular story, or any piece fanfiction at all altogether, while still being within bounds of the greater QQ rules).

On some other forums, the OP has the capability to, say, make a request of the staff to remove such unwanted content. Or perhaps threadban someone who consistently breaks the OP's unofficial rules for the thread.

My question is kinda sorta about just how much control over the content of their threads do the OP's have? Like, can they make rules like 'no [X] allowed here' despite such a thing not being against the official QQ rules?

My suggestion would be I guess to clarify what the original posters and thread-starters are capable of doing in their own threads. We all know about the ability freely make and change threadmarks, and to (within reason) request the staff to open and close their threads at OP's discretion, but just what else is there, if anything?
 
Whatever they are, there's also limits.

Rathmun will happily complain to you about the mods not coming down like a ton of bricks on someone who made a comment on a topic that rathmun did not like and had dealt with from a lot of other posters. But rathmun also relied on "thread cultural norms" to establish that this kind of comment was unwelcome, rather than explicitly stating what was unwelcome or posting a reference that implicitly established what was unwelcome.

I think that rathmun's desire to not have that behavior in their thread was perfectly reasonable, and the mods posting in that thread prior to that incident seemed to agree. Hell, the mods posting about it after that incident seemed sympathetic as well. But I think rathmun's approach to transmitting expectations of behavior made violations inevitable, and trying to browbeat and issue ultimatums to the mods made everything worse.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top