• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Sufficient Velocity Down?

Cloudflare has Published a blog on the Outage

https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-outage-on-june-21-2022/

Apparently there was an issue when an update hit certain servers, causing


And there are graphics that show how, despite only 4% of the networks locations going down, it cause a 50% outage in network requests. I would think they should consider spreading the load out more.

Cloudflare's name has come up a few times over the last few years for crap like this, though this is the worst I can remember hearing about. Considering that, I honestly have to wonder both why more people and companies don't turn elsewhere for what Cloudflare does and more broadly, how Cloudflare has managed to stay in business in general.
 
Well, there is the point that a handful of incidents, generally resolved within fifteen minutes to halff an hour, in several years is not actually a bad record for glitches and remediation. Then too, economies of scale most definitely apply for internet hosting, so splitting things off to make the structure as a whole more robust is disincentivized unless someone comes along to make them, and that takes political will that is generally not very strong if it's present at all for internet infrastructure despite how central it's become to life in most of the most influential parts of the world. That's probably an angle better taken to the threads I'm sure SB or SV have for this, though, not QQ where current politics is specifically a forbidden topic.

I definitely agree that getting back to a more grid-like overall internet architecture rather than the central hubs and trunks that it has been steadily shifting toward for decades would be preferable, for sure. Hard to route around damage to one node if a majority, or even just a large fraction, of traffic can only be handled by that node, whether because there's literally no other path or just because the alternatives can't deal with the throughput.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top