Navrin
Experienced.
- Joined
- May 2, 2014
- Messages
- 4,267
- Likes received
- 8,279
Well, "Sara Foster" is helping dig that hole deeper and deeper, and Deputy Director Renick just jumped in after them on very, VERY little information. Bad moves, people. Also, Renick, have a trope.
Also, it seems probable that Dana knows very, VERY little about who is cleared to know Sophia's identity or else she would know that there are people that she could call to get the word to pull Sophia back properly WAY faster than getting there in person. Or even just tell them "I have credible reason to believe that Shadowstalker is (insert one of several true reasons that she shouldn't be there); I suggest she be pulled back before (insert likely consequence of chosen true reason) What does she expect to do in person that she can't do over the phone, anyway? Bullets aren't worth much, she has no reason to know of the electricity weakness (and she might not have a stun gun of any type on her), and there are still the same secrecy limitations in person (though often harder to prove, of course). So, what's she thinking?
Thanks for the chapter, Ack. Though it's disappointing that it is probably going to take 10+ cycles before this one updates again.
For example: "Two of Sophia Hess' friends are suspects of a murder investigation and we suspect she knows about this and is trying to prove that they're innocent. Please pull her back before she tampers with the evidence; you know how people get when they're trying to prove their friends didn't do it and her efforts could easily prevent us from finding the real killers."
Also, it seems probable that Dana knows very, VERY little about who is cleared to know Sophia's identity or else she would know that there are people that she could call to get the word to pull Sophia back properly WAY faster than getting there in person. Or even just tell them "I have credible reason to believe that Shadowstalker is (insert one of several true reasons that she shouldn't be there); I suggest she be pulled back before (insert likely consequence of chosen true reason) What does she expect to do in person that she can't do over the phone, anyway? Bullets aren't worth much, she has no reason to know of the electricity weakness (and she might not have a stun gun of any type on her), and there are still the same secrecy limitations in person (though often harder to prove, of course). So, what's she thinking?
Thanks for the chapter, Ack. Though it's disappointing that it is probably going to take 10+ cycles before this one updates again.
For example: "Two of Sophia Hess' friends are suspects of a murder investigation and we suspect she knows about this and is trying to prove that they're innocent. Please pull her back before she tampers with the evidence; you know how people get when they're trying to prove their friends didn't do it and her efforts could easily prevent us from finding the real killers."
Last edited: