Zaru
Not too sore, are you?
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2023
- Messages
- 278
- Likes received
- 2,070
Okay cool. Was just asking on clarification. Thanks ChiefAs far as QQ is concerned, go for it. We have no rules around that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay cool. Was just asking on clarification. Thanks ChiefAs far as QQ is concerned, go for it. We have no rules around that.
Notably here your next suggestion don't actually solve any the issues mentioned before. Fair being fair, there could be some merit in having it listed as option in making new threads. But that doesn't actually answer any issues with enforcement or detection. It instead a sideways approach of looking for solution, an attempt to avoid the issues rather that solving it. So, the issue with enforcement and detection is in fact, not bullshit at all.All this hand-wringing about "theres no perfect enforcement mechanism" or "theres no flawless detection" is a bunch of absolute BS.
OK. Here's a very simple way to have this be implemented: You -and this not a generaly 'you', I really mean you, BreezyWheeze here, or at least anyone who support your idea- hire some programmers to code this as a Xenforo add on. Then offer QQ a free (perpetual) lisence to use the add on. Better still if you release it for free for anyone to use. Make sure to provide troubleshooting service for add on conflict or whatever bugs that may ariseYou could radically cut down on unflagged AI slop by simply making a default system where authors are required to select the level of AI usage - a simple dropdown that says "AI used to generate most/all text - AI used to generate some text - AI used to edit or beta read - AI not used at all" and have the dropdown be required when starting a new thread would go a LONG way, even if there were literally no rule or enforcement associated with the tag.