Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah.
Now this delves into rule 8 territory, so without going into great detail... there is absolutely nothing new about this sort of behavior in China. No small number of businesses have been recorded doing this ever since roughly the mid 90s when, for whatever incomprehensible reason, black people started migrating to China.So do people know that China is seeming to be banning African colored people from businesses.
In belated news, Uusimaa lockdown in Finland was lifted early on Wednesday. So I guess while my Easter was ruined, at least my winter holiday after next week might go better.
Possibly, time will tell. Suffice to say, since the lockdown was no longer deemed necessary, it had to be lifted immediately. It served its purpose to buy time to scale up intensive care capacity. And rest of Finland is not clean of the virus either.Yeah, but then the weeks after when all those people are infected will be much worse.
Whelp, I assure you the world watches to see what lessons can be learned from this turn of events.Possibly, time will tell. Suffice to say, since the lockdown was no longer deemed necessary, it had to be lifted immediately. It served its purpose to buy time to scale up intensive care capacity. And rest of Finland is not clean of the virus either.
The problem with that is that the world is very good at forgetting lessons and with great gusto too. It is not possible to do in major cities but but if America itself followed the example of Gunnison, Colorado during the Spanish Flu we would have already been done with the virus a month ago in every other portion of the country without even having an issue with the lack of medical supplies.Whelp, I assure you the world watches to see what lessons can be learned from this turn of events.
The simplest thing is to compare Sweden to other nations.
Sweden low-key adopted the herd immunity approach and it hasn't done them any favors.
Its a pandemic so our choices are:
1) Close economy, keep people at home, get measures in place so it doesn't spread exponentially and slowly reopen things
2) YOLO Economy, it spreads exponentially, economy closes from panic/deaths/worldwide slowdown due to pandemic
Either way the world economy dies as service industries collapse. 1 might keep more people alive, 2 is just running face first into a brick wall while pretending its made of sugar glass.
Wikipedia said:As of 18 April 2020, there were 13,822 confirmed cases, of which 1,054 received intensive care, and 1,511 deaths related to the newly found virus in Sweden, with Stockholm County being the most affected.[1]
I'll disagree with the notion that it's 2-5 times the Flu mostly due to the extreme response that several countries like China have taken that would ordinarily devastate their entire economy for little gain. That isn't to say that it is people are not overinflating numbers at times or that people are not taking advantage of the panic and it is rather annoying and sad that they do such things in a crisis.Personally I have to say I doubt this was really much more than 2-5 times worse than a typical bad flu year (~500,000 deaths worldwide). More and more is coming out about short selling scams run by people close to the officials who announced the lockdown, hypocritical (and politically convenient) u-turns from opposition leaders who said this was irrelevant in February to saying it's the end of the world now, and completely misleading record keeping of the deaths counting people who committed suicide by jumping off a building as coronavirus deaths because their corpse tested positive. (If we counted everyone who died with a common cold as a flu death how would that effect statistics?)
Now I'm going along with this, because like a lot of people a few weeks free time at home isn't a bad thing for me, but I'm pretty sure that when we look back at this we're going to see no real difference between the countries that run massive lockdowns and the ones that didn't bother. Maybe road deaths will be lower because most people weren't going anywhere. We're dumb, easily panicked, herd animals, when it comes down to it and if the US elections weren't coming in November I really doubt he media would have exploded on us the way it did about this when it didn't bother about Swine or Bird flu that were probably about as bad.
It would be nice to think that we'll keep some useful habits from this though, like making it socially acceptable to wear masks in public while sick or expecting people to keep some emergency food and supplies on hand. Unfortunately I expect it's more likely we all go back to normal except now our phones are tracked now and we get micro chipped in our mandatory vaccinations.
I'll disagree with the notion that it's 2-5 times the Flu mostly due to the extreme response that several countries like China have taken that would ordinarily devastate their entire economy for little gain. That isn't to say that it is people are not overinflating numbers at times or that people are not taking advantage of the panic and it is rather annoying and sad that they do such things in a crisis.
That being said I would be wary of any new vaccine and I would outright reject any proposed miracle procedure with a microchip. A rushed vaccine runs into the issues of how it will be mass produced and maintain quality without adversely affecting the person being injected. As for the microchip, that sounds like a corporate wet dream to gain billions off of senseless patch updates and invasive spying on people's porn stashes.
Personally I have to say I doubt this was really much more than 2-5 times worse than a typical bad flu year (~500,000 deaths worldwide).
Now these are quickly googled results, but they match what I've heard elsewhere.
In 'Deaths per Million Population' Sweden is behind France, Italy, Spain, the UK, Belguim and other first world countries. [Source 2]
We're still only at 1,500 deaths related to the virus as per wikipedia and a lot of other sources.
Around 90,000 people die every year in Sweden anyway, so about 7,500 is the expected rate of death in any given month. We need to judge the importance of Corona from that figure, and precisely who it targets. If an illness cuts a year off the end of my life while I'm suffering a poor quality of life anyway I'm less bothered than if it cuts me down as a happy five year old with a whole live ahead of me, for example. "Quality of life years lost" or whatever they call that officially.
and completely misleading record keeping of the deaths counting people who committed suicide by jumping off a building as coronavirus deaths because their corpse tested positive. (If we counted everyone who died with a common cold as a flu death how would that effect statistics?)
Unfortunately I expect it's more likely we all go back to normal except now our phones are tracked now and we get micro chipped in our mandatory vaccinations.
That is not how you measure the danger from a pandemic. It's the mortality rate that's relevant. Not the absolute number of deaths. Not the deaths per capita. Look at the deaths per total cases. Mortality rate combined with the spread rate will tell you how dangerous it is.
Are you asserting that all western countries are doing that, or at least that it's widespread enough to majorly distort the statistics? Because such coordination seems implausible.
Flat out wrong. The mortality rate of Swine flu was about the same as that of most seasonal flus, around 0.1%, so nobody cared. As for Bird flu, I'm assuming you meant the 2002-2004 SARS epidemic even though that was not derived from avian influenza. That had a mortality rate of 9-10% which is worse than the current pandemic, but it was much easier to contain and only about 8000 cases were recorded worldwide.
The mortality rate of the current China virus is currently unclear due to incomplete data, but all signs point to it being >5%.
Western populations are stupid enough to put up with a lot, but blatant "this app is tracking you" phone tracking and fucking microchips are both way too far. There's major pushback right now even with the pandemic still ongoing.
Okay. Why are you so certain everything is fine and there's nothing to worry about? Do you have actual data that says so, or is this an ideological thing you're parroting from whatever talking heads you subscribe to?
Okay. Why are you so certain everything is fine and there's nothing to worry about? Do you have actual data that says so, or is this an ideological thing you're parroting from whatever talking heads you subscribe to?
I don't care about conspiracy theories. If you have real data, present it.Why do you believe authority figures who've made this exact same mistake before to huge cost for us? The incentives all line up for them to profit from this without it having to be anything like they claim it is.
I don't care about conspiracy theories. If you have real data, present it.
Again, I don't care about that. If you have real reasons that aren't purely ideological to believe that COVID 19 isn't a big deal, I'd like to hear them. However, I am unwilling to expose my elderly father to possible death just to play along with someone's political position. Thus far, all you've got is ideology and conspiracy theory. Which is to say, you've got nothing worth acknowledging.See this is evidence. If I nod along with you and say "I'm so scared too" I get brownie points for that. If I question the narrative I'm a monster, and it's not like you're going to apologize and give me a prize on paypal if I'm right. People would hate me more for that. That's what politicians are dealing with right now, and we were probably doomed to that the moment the media hit on using this to bludgeon Trump over even the typical hundred thousand flu deaths like he's personally responsible.
Again, I don't care about that. If you have real reasons that aren't purely ideological to believe that COVID 19 isn't a big deal, I'd like to hear them. However, I am unwilling to expose my elderly father to possible death just to play along with someone's political position. Thus far, all you've got is ideology and conspiracy theory. Which is to say, you've got nothing worth acknowledging.
Peddling of conspiracy theories is not welcome in this thread. We've already ejected one crackpot for doomerism, I'm happy to kick out people doing the opposite.
Numbers. Data. Actual verifiable facts. Present some. Thus far you've been communicating with vague bullshit and soundbites just like one of the talking heads. You sound more like you're pushing an agenda than trying to inform and educate.You don't have to though. There'd be nothing wrong with voluntarily self isolating like some especially vulnerable people do during most flu seasons. It's making it mandatory and shutting in obese people, people with depression, people with businesses to take care of etc I think's going to be seen as worse than the disease.
Literally all of this:Can you clarify what thoughts you consider a 'conspiracy theory'? Overestimates of mortality, the phone tracking stuff, media/political motivations, etc? I'll take instruction but I'm not clear on what exactly I'm being told not to bring up in the thread.
This is unsubstantiated, unproven, borderline unproveable fearmongering at best and outright dishonesty at worse. This is what a conspiracy theory looks like. It's also a substantial Rule 8 violation as well.In China's case I'd suspect it was more economically motivated than anything else. The death rate there does seem to have been higher, for whatever reason, but they had economic motives for big action. Their economy depends on foreign investment and if everyone thought China had this huge pandemic going on they'd move the money out and start buying elsewhere. So they tried to make a big move on Wuhen and when it failed started lying about their numbers and bribing the WHO to keep quiet until it became a worldwide problem and no-one had anywhere to move out of China to. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if the CCP put a few coughing agents on planes to India, Pakistan or Germany when they saw how the western media was treating this.
I doubt it'd work but if the cops are harassing people for sitting in their gardens, arresting them for not wearing masks and fining pastors for holding drive-in sermons I absolutely believe the government could get away with mandatory vaccines. The phone data is almost certainly already collected illegally by the intelligence agencies (we got that from Assange, and his head rolled for it) they just can't use it to prosecute people in open court yet, so that could get pushed through. Microchips I'm less sure about. I don't know what it's really worth compared to phone tracking, but it keeps coming up in the coverage like we're being prepared for it.