• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Everyone from QQ wake up as their Avatar, what's the first thing we do in real life?

Pulsar said:
Get used to my new center of gravity.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Widowmaker said:
Would be closer to the ground, assuming male to female.

It's part of why women tend to be better dancers on average.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Especially with Dem Hipz.

BTW, obligatory offer to help with that...

SomeRandomeGuyAsWell said:
I wish to see the day where you make any alien invasion go nope.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I'll mostly content myself with punching those QQers who misuse their avatar's abilities.

For now.

Maybe I'll discover something that doesn't die in the first swing.

kinglugia said:
I too, want to molest not!Saitama. Consensually.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Not female enough, sorry.
MadGreenSon said:
So it's only the lack of the power to destroy everything that holds your rage in check? Huh.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

... Isn't that like everyone?

GhostHaxStomp said:
I say we let him go. If he thinks people suck just wait until there's nothing left.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Too many things I like. Though I can think of a list of highly punchable faces.

Lets just say a lot of people around the world will find themselves protected by the bald, bland-faced champion of peace and justice...

"You'll have your army stop me? That's adorable. I cast Fist."

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Psyckosama said:
Misread.

And yeah, its the one who put it out who gets Fisted.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That's fair. I mean, there'd be terrible side effects to having the Star of Exuberant Excess as the sun for our solar system, but he is not actively malicious and certainly wouldn't be trying to put out the sun, or anything else particularly bad.
Psyckosama said:
Rule 1: Don't be a cunt.

If you have questions, see Rule 1.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Fair enough. Like I said, the character that my avatars are based on is not actively malicious, or even terribly malicious in general on his own. If left to his own devices he'd mostly just hang out, swill intoxicants, and fuck women, men, and anything else he could seduce (He is an Exalted, so...). It was always his friends that convinced him to go do stuff.
 
SomeRandomeGuyAsWell said:
That


Is a very dangerous thing to have.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You can rest assured that if I wake up as my avatar, I'll certainly never be the source to such a thing. It would be literally unthinkable to that character. Everything he is, is about indulging excessively. Preventing someone from seeking pleasure is so against his nature that he'd never even think to try it.

And since everything he is, is carved into his being by Primordial magic, it'd be unthinkable to me too.
 
Malcanthet said:
Well there is Jilling off which you can do. Be prepared to take a while to get used to your new body as a general requirement methinks.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
On the plus side I'm tall as fuck. Also I'll never forget anything because that's a detail about Tolkien elves apparently. They remember basically everything.

So hopefully getting used to the body won't be too bad despite the vastly different build and nerves n' stuff.
MadGreenSon said:
I don't see why not. I mean, it's not called that as a woman, but there's nothing about elves that would prevent masturbation.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
True. Just, like, is weird to think about. Can't really properly call it jerking off if there's nothing to tug, after all.
 
Widowmaker said:
On the plus side I'm tall as fuck. Also I'll never forget anything because that's a detail about Tolkien elves apparently. They remember basically everything.

So hopefully getting used to the body won't be too bad despite the vastly different build and nerves n' stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Tolkien elves are basically immortal. So you'll have time to adjust. ;)
 
Speaking of being tall, I will technically be considered a shortstack yet barely.
 
Nickballas said:
Except curses.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

... Note to self, have a lesser villain in a story whose main claim to fame is cursing people to no longer be able to orgasm.

In an otherwise perfectly serious and perhaps a bit grimdark story.

Just because the universe sucks doesn't mean some asshole can't find a way to have fun with it.
 
TanaNari said:
... Note to self, have a lesser villain in a story whose main claim to fame is cursing people to no longer be able to orgasm.

In an otherwise perfectly serious and perhaps a bit grimdark story.

Just because the universe sucks doesn't mean some asshole can't find a way to have fun with it.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I think being unable to orgasm is a perfectly serious and grimdark affliction. Sounds absolutely hellish.
 
MadGreenSon said:
I think being unable to orgasm is a perfectly serious and grimdark affliction. Sounds absolutely hellish.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Actually, in thinking about it, I even have a plot that can be done.

Mainly one revolving around succession laws in a kingdom, with a king who now can't make babies.

Why not the old fashioned methods of murder and/or castration? Why, because MAGIC! of course. Killing rival nobles is of limited value in a world where healing and resurrection spells exist (for those who can afford them, at any rate).

Curses, on the other hand... while limited in many ways, are woven into the soul instead of burned into the flesh, and thus can circumvent the many, many, other methods to undo them.

Also: no immortality magic. What few magics even come close are worse than death by far. Or are so far up the cosmic food chain that even the most powerful of empires mean nothing to beings with such power.


... I just had a fucking plot bunny about not fucking. The fuck?
 
TanaNari said:
Mainly one revolving around succession laws in a kingdom, with a king who now can't make babies.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I mean, that isn't that unusual. There have been many times across history where kings just didn't have kids, didn't want to make kids or only made one kid because they couldn't stand their wife adn then the kid died before reproducing themselves etc..

Royal families tend to be big enough and connected with other families that unless something really goes wrong e.g. a extinction event, there would always be an heir around even if it means fusing with another nation.

Even without that there were cases where... people would just adopt someone and make them heir. This was a thing among the Romans and I think the Eastern Roman Empire did it too. In such an extreme case, I could see even a normally traditionally blood-only tradition being modified.

Perhaps have it be a Napoleon like situation, where the King overthrew the last rulers and much of the kingdom's legitimacy lies in his cult of personality, with the heir absolutely needing a connection to the current king or the whole thing will fall apart? Or maybe they need a heir to betroth to the neighbouring kingdom to get an supporter against the powerful Empire who wants to fuck them over..?
 
Heaven Canceler said:
Royal families tend to be big enough and connected with other families that unless something really goes wrong e.g. a extinction event, there would always be an heir around even if it means fusing with another nation.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Well, yeah, which leads to the question: if the king is without a direct heir, who's the default heir, and did said heir perhaps have a hand in the curse in the first place? Should that heir also be removed, and the title given to the third in line? Or is even that too obvious, and it's another party hoping to benefit from the two or three upper echelons of the kingdom being at each others' throats?

Y'know, a story that's actually worthy of a novel.

Come on, dude, you should know me well enough to be fully aware I don't stop at the surface level for this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
Heaven Canceler said:
I mean, that isn't that unusual. There have been many times across history where kings just didn't have kids, didn't want to make kids or only made one kid because they couldn't stand their wife adn then the kid died before reproducing themselves etc..

Royal families tend to be big enough and connected with other families that unless something really goes wrong e.g. a extinction event, there would always be an heir around even if it means fusing with another nation.

Even without that there were cases where... people would just adopt someone and make them heir. This was a thing among the Romans and I think the Eastern Roman Empire did it too. In such an extreme case, I could see even a normally traditionally blood-only tradition being modified.

Perhaps have it be a Napoleon like situation, where the King overthrew the last rulers and much of the kingdom's legitimacy lies in his cult of personality, with the heir absolutely needing a connection to the current king or the whole thing will fall apart? Or maybe they need a heir to betroth to the neighbouring kingdom to get an supporter against the powerful Empire who wants to fuck them over..?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
TBF, even with the Romans they usually only adopted folks with blood ties to them.

Even the Good Emperors. Hadrian was a relative of Trajan, and others were relatives.

And most successful long term emperors had some blood tie to the Julio-Claudians for the first couple centuries.

Making a third cousin one's heir isn't impossible.

Or all else fails, pull what Manuel wanted to do with Bela-Alexios before he had his own son.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top