Aaron Hardin
Not too sore, are you?
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2017
- Messages
- 314
- Likes received
- 3,192
Uh, copyright is why those wages exist at all, there have been a couple of notable cases of Copyright being bypassed in different ways in the US to prevent needing to pay fees to the original author, and while the second was relatively minor (all those messages about books with stripped covers and the author not being paid came about because of the people selling copies of Lord of the Rings by Tolkien without covers to avoid paying the author, but the copyright still turned out pretty well), the big one that really got screwed over was L Frank Baum, the writer of the Wizard of Oz, who also wrote 12 sequels afterwards, but the case of his works becoming open domain essentially followed by a lot of authors writing another 40 plus OZ books without him seeing a dime, pus not seeing a dime from the Wizard of Oz movie (so a lot of money was made on this, but he didn't get much of any of it).Yes. Creative industries often have winner-take-all pay curves and aren't sustainable as a sole income source unless you're in a relatively small top percentage of earners. That's got nothing to do with copyright either way though, it's just the nature of the game you're playing.
Having a copyright on a book is not a monopoly in the same way that owning an apple tree is not a monopoly. Yes, you are the only owner of that apple tree and no one else has it, so you have sole ownership of the apples it produces until you sell it, but there are plant of other apples that are similar (other books in the same genre), and there are also plenty of other varieties of apples (books in different genres).
It is why economists do not view copyrights generally as monopolies, because there are generally similar substitutes easily available so if you jack up the price of your story to say $1,000, the response from people is that they will buy a different book, not that they won't read a book at all.
A monopoly is where there is not a substitute, such as if you live in a place with only one high speed internet provider and they raise the price by $30 a month, you chooses are to either suck it up or go without high speed internet.