...Well, if you're just going to ignore everything, what the hell. Why not vote for a man who bankrupted every buisness he's ever been involved in, a man who advocates the murder of children, a man who thinks he'll be able to dictate what other countries do?
Because of course anyone who disagrees with your politics is Bad Wrong and voting for literally Hitler, and should be put into Thought Prison for committing the Though Crime of not holding your same values.
You remember when Trump said that all Muslims in America should wear visible identification at all times?
Don't try to make him look less dangerous. He's already inciting violence.
Do you even look at your sources?
Not as well as I should, I'll grant you that.
Are you defending a fake news site, that uses other fake news sites as sources? And your claim therein.
No. He is using a fake news site called 'NewsExaminer' - which is mimicking a legitimate news site called The News and Observer, which references a fake news site calling itself foxnews (seriously, it even uses a fucking hong kong URL) purporting to be Fox News.Not even.
I bet he's using the same fake news site as a source.
That's Valette for you. If you disagree with them, you are literally hitler!
Not even.
I bet he's using the same fake news site as a source.
No a defence, and not a he. I'll admit that I should have checked my source more closely, and I'll point out that you're quoting my admission.
Because he didn't, I support his position and he'll be able to.
He's wealthy because he spends other people's money while safeguarding his own.
TL: DR Edition: You're interested in becoming a terrorist. Well done, pat yourself on the back for coming up with a plan that leads to losing moral high ground over indiscriminate murderers while strengthening their recruitment efforts.
No, that's actually not true.
The man's plan isn't "help". It's "Have Mexico pay the entire cost of a wall that extends along the entire border, without asking if they want the wall".
We're not losing anything, moral high-ground doesn't exist in war. The best thing to do is to get it over with as quickly and as permanently as possible. Holding back out of misguided notions of morality will just lead to a lengthy conflict that leaves the area ripe for future battles. And their recruitment efforts never took a hit, ISIS is a rapidly growing movement that started as a tiny group and is now threatening the entire middle-east, because they represent what the people over there want. They want to be militant, to be religiously extreme, to be violent and kill the Great Satan. We can't reason with these people, they won't be impressed with our goodness because they ignore it. The only thing to do is to end the threat.
Yes, it actually is. The US led or contributed to nearly every military coalition, plus it supplies and advises many others. When Obama initially declined to lead the recent coalition against ISIL, all Europe was surprised and dismayed. America has the largest economy of any single nation and sends out the most foreign aid (which doesn't seem to get much gratitude) despite its own economic struggles.
Even if it doesn't and the US has to pay some or all of the cost, I support a wall entirely.
And onto ignore you go.
lol
HIGH ENERGY
That's been tried, notably when we deposed Saddam Hussein and installed a democratic government. Remember when everyone was so happy to be voting and showing off their purple-dyed fingers? And now its all going down the drain because the extremists are motivated and the moderates aren't. I've read plenty of testimonies from soldiers describing how the native armies we trained drop their weapons and hide when the Taliban or ISIS attacks.
I agree with this: Either commit entirely or stay out; half-measures just breed a new generation of enemies. But the political and economic willpower isn't there. IMO we should have never involved ourselves, playing World Police is more trouble than its worth.
