• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

The SFW image thread

OverReactionGuy said:
good luck with that. You would think that this anime would have a lot of porn to it. But nope.

It's one of the rare series that seems like it would have a lot of porn to it but no one touches it.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

That sucks six kinds of waterfowl waste.

Tax:

99VzmNn.jpeg
 
OverReactionGuy said:
good luck with that. You would think that this anime would have a lot of porn to it. But nope.

It's one of the rare series that seems like it would have a lot of porn to it but no one touches it.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Tbh most of these types of series are practically softcore already so most artists don't feel the need to make porn of them.
 
snthsnth said:
The human eye can only see 24fps, that's why films are made in that frame rate.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That's false. 20 is enough that you can see it as animation, but it's easy enough to notice it's choppiness (or at 24, or even 30, 40ish seems to be the average limit for the center of the eye for most people) if there's something fast moving on screen (or to notice it's excessively blurred).

Flickering is a different problem than smooth motion, noticing flickering in 40~60hz is not unusual, particularly at the edge of the vision. The edge of the vision is really good at fast moving things, unlike the center.

Noticing something appeared and then disappeared in a minuscule amount of time? Now that's a completely different problem, and well, we can, indeed, do that at what would be absurd fps if converted. We're talking 1/250ths of a second here.

Lastly, responsiveness adds another massive factor, which we can notice well above 24fps, and with games it's often the case that everything is tied to the fps, not just how long it takes the character to visually act, but also in sound, which we process much faster than sight.
 
aabbcc said:
That's false. 20 is enough that you can see it as animation, but it's easy enough to notice it's choppiness (or at 24, or even 30, 40ish seems to be the average limit for the center of the eye for most people) if there's something fast moving on screen (or to notice it's excessively blurred).

Flickering is a different problem than smooth motion, noticing flickering in 40~60hz is not unusual, particularly at the edge of the vision. The edge of the vision is really good at fast moving things, unlike the center.

Noticing something appeared and then disappeared in a minuscule amount of time? Now that's a completely different problem, and well, we can, indeed, do that at what would be absurd fps if converted. We're talking 1/250ths of a second here.

Lastly, responsiveness adds another massive factor, which we can notice well above 24fps, and with games it's often the case that everything is tied to the fps, not just how long it takes the character to visually act, but also in sound, which we process much faster than sight.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I was actually being sarcastic, and taking the whole 'no difference between 30 and 60' thing to an illogical extreme. That extreme being the lowest framerate that the human eye sees as motion, not the highest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top