Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this something that planting false evidence does, @OurLadyOfWires ?The only way we have to buy time to retrieve our manuscripts is to plant false evidence soooo... sorry Bureau! I don't trust that them getting a hold of our manuscripts will end anything but badly at their current loyalty levels.
My guess is the less Bureau understands the more freedom we will have when coming up with our own version of events in case we will need to explain ManuscriptsI imagine that whether the bureau finds the safe and opens up is not really dependant on what else we plant, or however many false leads there are…
Unlikely, it's either deliberate attack or nothing.
Summons have those bindings for a reason.
[X] Plan: A Paradoxical Riddle
The only way we have to buy time to retrieve our manuscripts is to plant false evidence soooo... sorry Bureau! I don't trust that them getting a hold of our manuscripts will end anything but badly at their current loyalty levels.
(damn you Baldomare for failing a DC60 roll!)
We don't get to pick which Lore(s) Velvet shares, remember?
Quick question about the plans that have both Sabotage and planting Lores, wouldn't the fact that the sabotage plants contradictory and wrong evidence on the scene make the Bureau less inclined to believe the Lore evidence as well? Like wouldn't that just make the Lore planting less effective for more risk as more evidence was planted (both Sabotage and Lores instead of just Lores or just Sabotage)? If people could give me an explanation about why this might not be the case then I'll throw my vote behind them but im currently confused.
The only way we have to buy time to retrieve our manuscripts is to plant false evidence soooo... sorry Bureau! I don't trust that them getting a hold of our manuscripts will end anything but badly at their current loyalty levels.
No. They find the manuscripts if they find the safe. Unrelated to evidence planted.Is this something that planting false evidence does, @OurLadyOfWires ?
What Ro said:Quick question about the plans that have both Sabotage and planting Lores, wouldn't the fact that the sabotage plants contradictory and wrong evidence on the scene make the Bureau less inclined to believe the Lore evidence as well?
My impression is that the sabotage is intended to disrupt the so to speak "conventional" investigation of who what when where and why in regards to Copper's cult. For example, "what were their monetary assets and where did they go?"
Between the chance they find it, attacking before the investigation, and at least some seeming desire to throw off the investigation as well…RIP @Greymere , your hopes dashed by the cruel power of the QM. The safe lies beyond your reach to influence.
Between the chance they find it, attacking before the investigation, and at least some seeming desire to throw off the investigation as well…
I'm sort of confused why we used them at all!
Do we know this is how it works?
1 of 3 possibilities, the DC is lower for each evidence, the Bureau gets a roll for each evidence, or both.Do we know this is how it works?
Vs. Say, A roll to notice that the evidence was planted as opposed to natural?