Imperator Pax
Talon Master
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 5,947
- Likes received
- 79,932
I'm going to be honest, I don't think they would win. I think Japan would pull off a pyrhic victory, and I say this because the IJA and IJN in 42 (so in the following year maybe early spring) would waste resources on that potentially even replacing Yamashita to do it, that Singapore would fall but we would be talking a hundred plus thousand Japanese casualties in three four months of fighting, and a significant amount of material expended, for not a lot gained. Denying the IJN the fuel bunkers significantly reduces Japanese operational activity in 42 and 43 and the loss of that manpower significantly reduces what Japan can do further afield, but I expect that the IJA and IJN would expend those lives to take Singapore in a hope that Britain would come to the negotiating table but just denying them the fuel bunkers would severely curtail the IJN and IJA's ability to move forces for potentially the rest of the war.Indeed.And, even with supplies going for soviets,they would hold there/and lost Malaya in 1943/.If they have average capable general there.
With supplies for soviets going to Singapoore,they would win.
England truly pulled defeat from jaws of victory there.
And I base this on in particular that even into 44 and 45 the IJA was of the opinion 'man if we throw a million men at the problem and we'll win and then they'll have to surrender come to terms' so I would fully expect that Japan would pursue their teppodama strategy against singapore casualties be damned
Last edited: