ATP
Well worn.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
- Messages
- 5,253
- Likes received
- 10,193
The Krupp in this case is the 1873 model that entered service immediately after the Franco Prussian war. So outside of the export market got completely superseded, but interestingly though the Burmese liked them, and Kiangnan arsenal actually liscened produced copies. I've heard that Japan liscened out production of the 6cm 1873 but I've never seen proof... but this is a casae of Krupp made a lot of guns that ended up on the export market that reflected prussian doctrine of the time, but were then quickly superseded in service (kiangnan would produce these 60lb armstrongs (which was another gun that was out of date had teething problems to start with) some others of good quality. As an arsenal Kiangnan was a good artillery caster)
Doctrine was basically stuck in the early 19th century of the cannons are going to be out front unsupported or minimally supported by infantry rather than in the rear firing indirect. So yeah very obsolete by 1914 never mind 1917 . The other thing that makes it rather a wasted ammunition is that again Xian put this advance forward to see how far the enemy gets before they face meaningful resistance but the royalist forces are already politically collapsing and are about to lose Peking anyway.
I read,that in 1914 russians were best in indirect fire - but so what,when they run out of ammo after few months.....