Pittauro
Versed in the lewd.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
- Messages
- 2,134
- Likes received
- 7,602
Eating Velvet Hill is a bad idea
1. We are close to All In. There are many things we want to achieve before then, and we want our focus on those things. As I believe @Greymere mentioned, it's therefore valuable to not make a mess. Not cause craziness we'll need to deal with or that'll throw off our plans. Kiling our father would make a mess. We're killing off our family's head. We're killing a mafia-org's head at the same time it's second-in-command is leaving. This is going to be a mess.
2. We don't need to. I'm not even talking about Girldinner here. But for the same cost of effort, we could just... abduct literally anyone else. A random criminal off the street, if we'd like.
3. We're way overconfident on its easiness. This is the head of a mob family. You don't think he's going to have some capacity to escape? Some level of guards? Names are strong, but this is risky!
To reiterate my opinion:
Killing Velvet Hill is BETTER than killing Spoiled Rich, in my opinion, both morally (he's a worse person) and narratively because it's Velvet finally getting even with the pony who nearly ruined her life and abandoned her.
He Doesn't REALLY deserve death for what he did to Velvet (he didn't threw her out. Emotional Neglect is horrible, but not death-penalty worthy), BUT we have the comfortable excuse of "he's also a criminal who got away with who knows how many crimes".
That said, yeah, it would STILL be better to take a random psychopath instead.
It's a bit less risky, as there's fewer reasons for suspicion to lead to us.
It's not personal, which means it's also likely to weight less on Velvet's conscience. Or to horrify other people if they find out (you have to admit that "I sacrificed a serial killer/pedophile for power" sounds LESS BAD than "I sacrificed my father for power").
it doesn't really cost much more. I'd say it's basically just an extra scrying action to find the worst and most vulnerable criminal we can get with a single Biedde action.
It's also likely to cost fewer bits, as getting a prisoner normally should be just a Biedde action, while getting Velvet Hill is a SHORT EXPEDITION, we'd likely want to send Biedde and either Axe or Mareinette (probably Mareinette as a follower, so no action cost for her), which means we need 50 bits put aside for them (even if we'll likely get some back).
Admittedly we could get some side benefits, like stealing some bits too... but that's secondary.
In other words: I'm still for "scry for criminal, send Biedde to capture him, Have Forge Name build the prison" idea, instead of "combo moth+grail on Spoiled" or "take vengeance on daddy", which are more personal, and by virtue of being personal they'll weight heavier on Velvet.
With what bits?
We literally don't have the cash with how the thread has insisted on throwing away money.
Sell the Moth 3 artifact, that's probably 200 bits.
@OurLadyOfWires Once we've studied an artifact and you said we can probably sell them with free actions, have you already decided if the price is automatic and what it is? Also are the bits usable the same turn we sell it or the turn after?
Which means,
Turn 22: study moth 3
Turn 23: sell it.
Can we use those bits on turn 23 or not?
I would argue that Windy Flakes is a better target than Hills, just that we would need to spend an action on finding him first.
Not really? Windy Flakes is if anything the WORST target, at least in terms of ease. He is, after all, the last cultist left. He might have Neighnia, if not he likely has Windigoes or maybe even Ash Ghouls.
It might still be a good pick because we'd be removing another threat AND getting some other resources out of it (he certainly owns artifacts at least), but...
...damn, he WAS our friend. I don't want to eat him! I barely even wanted to kill Copper, and I only went for that because once we were committed to the war I didn't think peace was really viable!